A through-line between Nietzsche, Lacan and Andrew Tate.
Great interview.
Yeah, it's like we've developed this objective philosophising, and then we compete with other objective philosophisers to see who's best!
Bringing the personal aspect in creates more vulnerability and riskiness, I think. It's attractive without being some kind of dopamine battle.
Thanks Devaraj
Yes - it is riskier to share the personal stuff. Makes me see "objective" intellectual distance is as a defence mechanism
Yes, I agree. I recognise that when I do it, it's like there's a kind of arrogance there, like I just wanna tell people how stuff is, like I'm hiding a personal insecurity or something.
Great interview.
Yeah, it's like we've developed this objective philosophising, and then we compete with other objective philosophisers to see who's best!
Bringing the personal aspect in creates more vulnerability and riskiness, I think. It's attractive without being some kind of dopamine battle.
Thanks Devaraj
Yes - it is riskier to share the personal stuff. Makes me see "objective" intellectual distance is as a defence mechanism
Yes, I agree. I recognise that when I do it, it's like there's a kind of arrogance there, like I just wanna tell people how stuff is, like I'm hiding a personal insecurity or something.